The complex world of “honest services fraud” (18 U.S.C. § 1346) has garnered headlines in recent years through high-profile cases such as the “Varsity Blues” college admission scandal and the “FIFA Case” involving corruption in international soccer. Although the Supreme Court has reversed a number of public corruption convictions in recent years (see, e.g., Percoco v. United States, 598 U.S. 319 (2023), Kelly v. United States, 590 U.S. 391 (2020), McDonnell v. United States, 579 U.S. 550 (2016)), the honest services fraud legal minefield continues to trip up countless executives, politicians, and public officials.
Honest services fraud is a serious charge that can have devastating consequences for your career and personal life. But with the right defense strategy, you can protect yourself and your reputation. McKenzie Scott’s experienced honest services fraud lawyers are here to help you navigate these legal issues. Let’s examine the intricacies of honest services fraud defense and explore how you can safeguard your interests.
For a free consultation with a California honest services fraud defense Lawyer, call (619) 794-0451.
What is honest services fraud? Before we talk defense, let’s break down what these specific charges entail. In short, these charges are brought by federal officials when they suspect someone of depriving another of their right to honest services through bribery or kickback schemes. This often involves public officials or corporate executives who allegedly abuse their positions for personal gain.
Violating Section § 1346 can involve a number of alleged scenarios:
"Mr. Scott and Mr. Bourassa helped our family tremendously. We were able to meet with the team immediately to address important matters. I was very comfortable with them and their concern for my family’s welfare. Our very stressful time ended up without consequence because of the effort they put into the case. Ultimately our day in court never came and no charges were made. I am thankful to have chosen this team and I would definitely recommend to others needing defense attorneys."
April
If you’re facing honest services fraud charges, there are several effective strategies that McKenzie Scott’s elite and proven criminal defense attorneys can employ:
1. Challenging the Evidence
Prosecutors must prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, they’ll argue that:
McKenzie Scott’s defense team diligently analyzes the government’s purported evidence, steadfastly questioning its reliability or relevance. This typically involves scrutinizing financial records, communication logs, or witness testimonies to identify inconsistencies or alternative explanations.
2. Proving Lack of Intent
Honest services fraud requires intent to deceive and cheat. If you can show that your actions were made in good faith or due to a misunderstanding, you may have a strong defense. Our team of aggressive attorneys will independently investigate all aspects of your case, demonstrating the legitimate and lawful decision-making behind your conduct or demonstrating that you reasonably relied on what appeared to be sound legal advice before taking the disputed actions.
3. Demonstrating No Material Misrepresentation
The prosecution must prove that the alleged fraud involved a material misrepresentation. If the “deception” was trivial or inconsequential, it may not meet the legal threshold for fraud. Your team of defense attorneys at McKenzie Scott can work to demonstrate that the alleged misrepresentation had no significant impact on the alleged victim’s decision-making process.
4. Statute of Limitations
Honest services fraud charges must be brought within a certain timeframe. Our attorneys can investigate whether the statute of limitations has expired. This defense requires a careful examination of when the alleged fraudulent acts supposedly occurred and when the government became aware of them.
5. Constitutional Challenges
In some cases, our attorneys might challenge the constitutionality of the honest services fraud statute as applied to your specific situation. This could involve arguing that the law is too vague or that it violates your due process rights.
Creating a culture of compliance within your organization can be key to preventing honest services fraud. This often involves more than just having a written policy; it requires ongoing training, clear communication of ethical standards, and a system for employees to report concerns without fear of retaliation.
CEOs and businesses may consider implementing certain measures to protect against honest services fraud charges:
Honest services fraud cases are typically prosecuted at the federal level, which means you’ll be dealing with federal courts and prosecutors. Federal prosecutors commonly tout a 95% conviction rate. Accordingly, which criminal defense attorney you choose to handle your case is critical.
Federal charges and ensuing trials can be a daunting process, but understanding what to expect can help. Keep in mind that:
Working with McKenzie Scott’s criminal defense attorneys, who have extensive experience in federal court, is crucial. Our team understands the nuances of federal procedures and how to effectively navigate this complex system.
If convicted of honest services fraud, the Federal Sentencing Guidelines play a significant role in determining the punishment. These guidelines take into account factors such as the amount of loss, the defendant’s role in the offense, and any prior criminal history. Our defense attorneys are well-versed in these guidelines and able to argue for the most favorable interpretation of your case.
A conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1346 carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison and fines of up to $250,000.
However, the prison sentence can increase to 30 years and the fine to $1,000,000, if the Section 1346 violation:
Sentencing enhancements or increases may be considered if the defendant is deemed to be an “organizer or leader” in the alleged honest services fraud crimes. The amount of loss, the number of victims who were impacted by financial hardship, the risk of death or seriously bodily injury, and other factors can result in a further increase to an honest services fraud sentence. This is one of the many factors which make having the best honest services fraud lawyer fighting in your corner so important.
The legal landscape surrounding honest services fraud is constantly changing. Recent Supreme Court decisions and Appellate Court decisions have clarified the scope of the law, making it more challenging for prosecutors to secure convictions. In fact, although honest services fraud charges continue to be brought against countless individuals, the Supreme Court and other Appellate Courts have recently reversed a number of convictions, including:
Supreme Court Reversed Honest Services Fraud Decisions:
In Skilling v. United States, the Supreme Court made clear that the honest services fraud statute addressed at its core only schemes to defraud involving bribes and kickbacks. If the statute were not so limited, it would encounter serious vagueness problems.
Pending Supreme Court Honest Services Fraud Cases:
Additionally, the Supreme Court is considering another important honest services fraud case – Kousisis v. United States. This case focuses on whether deception to induce a commercial exchange can constitute mail or wire fraud even if inflicting economic harm on the alleged victim was not the target of the alleged scheme. The Court could potentially further limit the reach of federal mail and wire fraud statutes in honest services cases.
First Circuit Court of Appeals Reversed Honest Services Fraud Decisions:
Lower courts continue to hear-and reverse-challenges to honest services convictions. In spite of such reversals, the Department of Justice continues to aggressively pursue these cases, often using expansive alternative theories to criminalize broad categories of conduct.
Such legal developments can have a significant impact on your defense strategy, and McKenzie Scott’s team always remains vigilant in staying abreast of current caselaw as well as crafting our own novel challenges on behalf of our clients.
Advancements in technology have significantly changed how honest services fraud is investigated and prosecuted. Digital forensics now play a major role in these cases, with investigators combing through emails, text messages, and financial records to build their case. On the flip side, this technology also provides new opportunities for defense teams to challenge the prosecution’s evidence and present alternative narratives.
Remember, facing honest services fraud charges doesn’t mean “game over.” With the right legal team and defense strategy, you can fight these allegations and protect your rights. Don’t hesitate – if you’re under investigation or facing charges, seek legal counsel immediately by calling McKenzie Scott’s San Diego federal criminal defense lawyers at 619-794-0451. Your freedom and your future may depend on it.
In high-profile honest services fraud cases, managing public perception can be almost as important as the legal defense itself. Negative media coverage can damage your reputation and potentially influence the jury pool. Your defense team at McKenzie Scott includes experienced professionals who can handle media relations and help shape the narrative surrounding your case.
Some key strategies for managing media during a fraud case include:
Remember, what you say outside the courtroom can have a significant impact on your case. Always consult with your attorney before making any public statements about the charges against you.
If you’re facing honest services fraud charges, acting immediately can help improve your chances of establishing a successful defense strategy. McKenzie Scott’s criminal defense lawyers have a depth of experience that is unparalleled. Our dedicated team has successfully handled numerous honest services fraud cases on behalf of clients like you.
Reach our proven defense lawyers today to discuss your case by calling 619-794-0451.
"I’m very grateful to Mr. Scott and his firm. We never felt like ‘clients.’ He viewed us as individuals of incalculable worth. He understood that we put the most difficult situation of our lives in his hands and he wasn’t going to let us down. It was obvious that Mr. Scott valued the truth and justice of our situation over his own ego. He is the farthest thing from the stereotypical attorney. Every attorney and paralegal in his office was equally qualified and motivated. Their work gave us peace of mind and confidence throughout the mediation and trial processes. They were extremely attentive to detail, and able to uncover significant details that we had not noticed despite being more intimately aware of the situation. They sifted through enormous amounts of data and properly distinguished the most important elements of the case from those of lesser importance. The storyline of our situation was patiently woven together over the course of the trial and the jury was not lacking any important elements. He was never too busy to answer a call, email or text. He was factual rather than emotional. Our trial ended more quickly and favorably than we anticipated as a result of Mr. Scott’s professional and human excellence."
Chris Ambuul
The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only; it is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship with those accessing the website and the firm is not intending to provide any individuals with legal advice as to any particular matter. Additionally, prior results achieved by the firm do not represent a guarantee or prediction of similar results in any other cases. The facts of each case are unique. This website may contain attorney advertising.
@ Copyright 2024 McKenzie Scott Civil Rights & Criminal Defense Lawyers. All Rights Reserved | Sitemap